Skip to main content

What ODD Looks Like Through Covid-19 Lenses

Twelve months ago, the idea of conducting an operational due diligence (ODD) on a fund manager remotely would have been derided as sheer madness. The ability for investors to spot irregularities or non-compliance at managers will be severely compromised if ODD were to be conducted through a video link, people would have argued. Now, virtual ODD is the new normal and will be for some time until the pandemic runs its course. After putting allocations on hold during the initial stages of COVID-19, institutions, fuelled by the US equity market recovery in the summer, are now once again investing in fund managers.

A new working model

With the entire global asset management industry now overwhelmingly working from home (WFH), ODD teams have been forced to embrace technology. Validating NAVs (net asset values) and verifying cash movements – activities once conducted in person and on-site by ODD teams – are now being performed online via screensharing. That said, some asset managers are understandably nervous about investors taking screenshots of proprietary data, and insist that NDAs be signed by clients ahead of them sharing this information online. However, the consensus is that asset managers have become increasingly transparent during the pandemic and are willing to disclose more information to ODD teams in the absence of being able to conduct physical meetings.

New risks

WFH also creates new risks. Outside of an office environment, employees are more vulnerable to cyber-attacks, especially if they are working off an unencrypted network or personal devices lacking VPNs and the protection of a company firewall. In a working from home set-up, people are also more likely to let their cyber-security guard slip, opening them up to potential phishing attacks. ODD teams want assurances that cyber-hygiene is being taken seriously by managers (i.e., staff are working on secure devices, using VPNs and cloud-based technology). Investors have also said that managers ought to be reviewing employees’ cyber-awareness by conducting email phishing tests.

Investors also need to be confident that distributed workforces at asset managers have disaster recovery processes to handle disruption in their own places of residence, such as power outages. In fact, some investors recommend asset management employees be equipped with generators, additional batteries for laptop devices, and even satellite phones. The pandemic has also called into question whether it is necessary for organisations to maintain expensive disaster recovery sites, especially as they have not been used during the pandemic and other past crises such as Hurricane Sandy and 9/11. It is probable that managers will look to downsize their disaster recovery sites moving forward.

The advantages of remote working

Despite the logistical challenges inherent with virtual ODD, there are some potential advantages. Firstly, the absence of travelling and commuting has freed up resources at institutional investors, leading to organisational-wide efficiencies. The inability to travel also means it is easier for investors to speak with more members of the asset management team than they otherwise might have done. However, most investors and asset managers recognise that virtual ODD – while an adequate temporary solution given the extreme circumstances – is not as effective as a physical on-site visit.

Is virtual here to stay?

The longer-term effects of COVID-19 will be felt across the world of ODD. As and when the pandemic ends, ODD teams are likely to travel less frequently, not least because investors will need to find ways to keep their operating costs down. As a result, ongoing monitoring of asset managers will likely stay virtual with checks conducted more regularly to compensate for the reduction in physical visits. However, experts agree that the initial ODD will continue to be conducted in person.

Jeremy Siegel is CEO at Portfolio BI


© The Sortino Group Ltd

All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency or other Reprographic Rights Organisation, without the written permission of the publisher. For more information about reprints from AlphaWeek, click here.